The BMI continues to dominate research on obesity and guide physicians' advice to patients. But some researchers have launched a rear-guard effort to knock the measure from its place atop the public-health pedestal. To replace — or at least supplement — the BMI, they are searching for measures that might offer individual patients a better gauge of their health risks, as well as a wider range of options to better their odds of staying healthy.
They'll also need tools to do so that are as cheap and simple as the BMI. Most techniques that measure body composition, including the Bod-Pod, the dual-energy X-ray absorption test (DEXA), and hydrostatic underwater weigh-in, are costly and time-consuming. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, an inexpensive and reliable gauge of body composition increasingly used in weight-management programs, may be practical in some general medical practices. But researchers are increasingly looking for ways to capture such information with tools as simple and inexpensive as tape measures.
One of the easiest alternatives to the BMI is waist measurement. With growing evidence that fat girdling the waist and visceral organs disturbs metabolism, the circumference of a patient's midsection has been shown to be a better predictor of Type 2 diabetes risk than the BMI.
Finally, an increasing number of researchers cite a major gap in the BMI: its inability to reflect the health effects of an individual's exercise habits. At least seven high-profile studies in the last decade have established that even for people with high BMIs, cardiovascular risk and the likelihood of early death are driven down significantly by maintaining a high level of fitness or at least regular physical activity. The risk of Type 2 diabetes also falls, although in that case, studies suggest that whittling waist circumference is a better strategy still.
Source: L.A. Times